Lightly Seared On The Reality Grill

Random expat geekery from The Low Countries

Browsing Posts tagged Google

Over in iDevelop, Jon Paris and Susan Gantner ask Are you ‘LinkedIn’? The post touches on LinkedIn’s initial purpose – essentially keeping in touch with colleagues and making new (work) contacts based on who you know. They then go on to question LinkedIn’s role now.

On the one hand it’s increasingly utilized as a marketing tool. Sometimes overtly: “Company XYZ is pleased to announce. …” Very often covertly: “Does anyone know of a good tool that can. …” Threads of this latter type often eventually reveal that the original poster was either an employee of a company offering tooling in this arena or is a “satisfied customer.” We find these kinds of threads particularly annoying, in part because we feel we’re already subject to enough advertising without having it rammed down our throats everywhere we go. In the long run they may well have a negative effect because they can result in even users avoiding responding to the most genuine of queries.

It also seems to be being increasingly used for the pure “How do I” or the “I’m getting decimal data errors …” type of questions that we feel are much better suited for Internet forums such as midrange.com or IBM’s RPG Cafe. It just seems to us that LinkedIn really wasn’t designed for these types of questions. As result, the same question is often asked in multiple groups.

This does ring very true for me. There are innumerable professional groups on LinkedIn and they are increasingly cluttered with either job adverts, recruitment requests or (often very basic) technical problems that would be better handled elsewhere.

The redundancy of the groups is also a problem. I see the same posts and same conversations cropping up over and over again. This is annoying because, even if I was interested in a question the first time around, seeing it cropping up repeatedly does become increasingly spammy.

The thing that keeps LinkedIn afloat is its focus on being a network for business users but the site really does need to keep the clutter to a minimum if this approach is to work.

I still have a LinkedIn account, and will be retaining it for the forseeable future – primarily because there are work related contacts that I want to maintain on there. But I also find myself increasingly considering whether an IBM i circle on Google+ would be a better way of staying in touch with current, former and future colleagues.

flattr this!

So I turned 43 today. Google noticed.

flattr this!

+1

No comments

Having signed up to Google+ at the start of this month, I have finally found some time to add a +1 button to this blog, thanks to The Google +1 plugin.

I don’t get a lot of comments on here, and don’t expect to either. But if you do find yourself stumbling across a post or page that raises a smile, give the button a click. Or not.

flattr this!

Google +1

No comments

It’s not immediately obvious, but linking to stuff on Google+ from outside the network is very easy. Which means I can say thank you to Robert Graffham for sharing this handy cheat sheet.

flattr this!

Google+

No comments

Now that the initial hype has died down somewhat, it appears that Google are now letting people into their latest attempt to do social networking. So I have a Google+ Account.

I’m not convinced that I need yet another social network – or any unfocussed network, for that matter – but I am willing to see how it goes. Feel free to drop by, add me to a circle or do whatever counts as social in the Chocolate Factory.

flattr this!

Google Scholar claims to provide a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. I had assumed that this meant that it indexes content only from scholarly literature – peer reviewed journals and the like.

Apparently not.

flattr this!