While discussing George Galloway’s win in the Bradford West byelection, Andrew Rawnsley observes:
More grotesquely, ungorgeous George proclaims himself to be the herald of a “Bradford Spring”. It is a very advanced form of narcissism to view a byelection upset in a parliamentary democracy as the equivalent of the moral courage displayed by those who have risked their lives in uprisings against entrenched tyrannies. This bilge is especially nauseating when it flows from the same lips which once offered their owner’s warm salutations to Saddam Hussein.
Rawnsley also points out that:
Mr Galloway, who declined to offer his fusion of Marxism and Islamism to voters at the five previous byelections of this parliament, did not choose this seat at random. He took his unique brand of politics to Bradford West because it looked like a promising place to get himself back into the Commons. “All praise to Allah!” he yelled as he made a victory lap of the constituency. There was a substantial and disaffected Muslim vote, among whom anger with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq burns strongly.
Obviously, Rawnsley has much more to say but I do think these two paragraphs effectively sum up the self-absorbed cynicism at the root of everything George Galloway says and does. Self-absorbed because of his unblushing willingness to compare his safe middle-class existence to that of people taking real risks to achieve real freedoms – freedoms that would be quickly crushed by the authoritarians to which Galloway spends his time sucking up.
And cynical. Cynical because he hasn’t won some astounding victory. He has – at Bethnal Green and Bow – identified a seat where his rather unpleasant brand of dog-whistle politics can be used to exploit and exacerbate existing tensions.
“God KNOWS who is a Muslim. And he KNOWS who is not. Instinctively, so do you. Let me point out to all the Muslim brothers and sisters what I stand for:
“I, George Galloway, do not drink alcohol and never have. Ask yourself if you believe the other candidate in this election can say that truthfully.”
As Sedgemore points out, Galloway has nothing to lose and everything to gain in adopting such tactics. He is an effective enough campaigner to get away with such an approach and, as long as nothing gets nasty before the next general election when he finds himself out on his ear again, Galloway will be gone long before his chickens come home to roost.
Nick Cohen has more:
Galloway and others on the far left believe that Muslims can replace the white working class that let them down so badly by refusing to follow their orders to seize power. In his hunt for a new revolutionary proletariat, Galloway’s politics have become unashamedly communalist. If a conservative politician were to seek to appeal to whites in the same manner, the left would scream “racist” until they ran out of breath and the BBC would go on a war footing.