– Nick Tyrone on Labour’s pitiful handling of the Article 50 Bill.
Pimping out the Queen for Donald Trump. This, apparently, is what they meant by getting our sovereignty back.
Ken Clark’s speech in the, otherwise largely pointless, Article 50 debate is superb. Go watch it:
[A] bizarre melange of the unqualified and the unhinged.
– Mehdi Hasan on the Trump cabinet
I have to hand it to Jeremy Corbyn: he never ceases to amaze.
Back in September, he said:
It isn’t migrants that drive down wages, it’s exploitative employers and the politicians who deregulate the labour market and rip up trade union rights.
It isn’t migrants who put a strain on our NHS, it only keeps going because of the migrant nurses and doctors who come here filling the gaps left by politicians who have failed to invest in training.
It isn’t migrants that have caused a housing crisis; it’s a Tory government that has failed to build homes.
This was quite a remarkable position for Corbyn to take as it it managed to be principled, consistent and true.
So, it was probably inevitable that he would abandon it:
Labour is not wedded to freedom of movement for EU citizens as a point of principle.
But nor can we afford to lose full access to the European markets on which so many British businesses and jobs depend. Changes to the way migration rules operate from the EU will be part of the negotiations.
It’s not that he’s trying to weasel his way into an imaginary compromise between the leave and remain factions of his own party that is so impressive, it’s the spectacularly inept manner in which he has attempted to do it.
The best thing that Labour could do now is pack their collective bags and go home in order to leave the way clear for a competent and progressive alternative to emerge.
Evidence, facts and reason are the building blocks of civilisation. Without them we plunge into darkness.
People would rather blame their low pay upon immigrants than on the fact that they are incompetent unskilled buffoons.
This is probably going to turn out as less of a post and more of a list of links, but the pattern is both worrying and worth pointing out.
First up, The Economist on the increasing sophistication of Putin’s propaganda machine:
The Kremlin’s bet on marginal right-wing parties has paid off as they have moved into the mainstream. It has pumped out disinformation and propaganda both through its official media channels, such as the RT and Sputnik news networks, and through thousands of paid internet trolls. Its cyber-attacks against Western countries produced troves of emails and documents which it dumped into the hands of foreign media, disrupting America’s presidential elections to the benefit of Mr Trump.
And a motivation:
Unlike the Socialists of the 1930s, the Kremlin and its friends today are driven not so much by ideology as by opportunism (and, in Russia’s case, corruption). Mr Putin’s primary goal is not to present an alternative political model but to undermine Western democracies whose models present an existential threat to his rule at home. Having lived through the Soviet collapse, he is well aware that the attraction of the prosperous, value-based West helped defeat communism. The retreat of that liberal democratic idea allows Russian propagandists to claim a victory.
Lithuanian MEP, Petras Austrevicius has seen it all before:
A lot of Europeans think that Russian propaganda does not concern them.
These people are in denial on Russia, whose propaganda has infected European debate like a virus.
We are already late in trying to react. Some are still not ready to start.
And, just to underline the point, Russia’s state-owned RT network will start broadcasting in French next year, just in time for the presidential election. And Germany’s intelligence agency has accused Russia of hacking its politicians and election systems under the guise of online activism.
And for the effectiveness of all this, the BBC notes that:
Despite Donald Trump’s boasts to the contrary, he’s entering the White House with a very tenuous claim to a presidential mandate. He trails Democrat Hillary Clinton in the popular vote by 2.8 million votes, and while he posted a comfortable electoral college win, by historical standards it ranks towards the bottom of victory margins (46th out of 58 presidential contests).
The Kremlin has managed to manipulate the media and is continuing to do so. And the media, often more concerned with ratings than reality, are allowing themselves to be played for idiots.
We should all be very concerned.
Rightwingers are living in a dream world. Parochial and insular, like May, as uninterested in foreign cultures as she is, as convinced that they can dismiss opposition as brutally as she does, they forget that other countries have their politics too.